[FIX] coding style

pull/100/head
Holger Brunn 2015-03-18 10:22:38 +01:00
parent b09a74053f
commit 48e8f885d5
1 changed files with 3 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ class IrFilters(Model):
context=context): context=context):
domain = eval_n(this['domain_this']) domain = eval_n(this['domain_this'])
for u in self.read(cr, uid, this['union_filter_ids'], for u in self.read(cr, uid, this['union_filter_ids'],
['domain', 'evaluate_always', 'model_id'], ['domain', 'evaluate_always', 'model_id'],
context=context): context=context):
if u['evaluate_always']: if u['evaluate_always']:
matching_ids = self.pool[u['model_id']].search( matching_ids = self.pool[u['model_id']].search(
cr, uid, eval_n(u['domain']), cr, uid, eval_n(u['domain']),
@ -96,8 +96,7 @@ class IrFilters(Model):
context=None): context=None):
self.write(cr, uid, ids, {'domain_this': field_value}) self.write(cr, uid, ids, {'domain_this': field_value})
def _evaluate_get(self, cr, uid, ids, field_name, args, def _evaluate_get(self, cr, uid, ids, field_name, args, context=None):
context=None):
"""check if this filter contains references to x2many fields. If so, """check if this filter contains references to x2many fields. If so,
then negation goes wrong in nearly all cases, so we evaluate the then negation goes wrong in nearly all cases, so we evaluate the
filter and remove its resulting ids""" filter and remove its resulting ids"""